The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Stephens, 966 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1992):
The government cites United States v. Makres, 851 F.2d 1016, 1018-19 (7th Cir.1988), for the proposition that the intent to suspend a sentence under section 3651 may be inferred from the language of the judgment and therefore, a sentencing court need not expressly state that it is suspending either the imposition or execution of sentence. But we read Makres to be a case like this one, where section 3651
Page 514
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.