The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Hughes, 132 F.3d 41 (9th Cir. 1997):
This court has long held that in order to conduct a warrantless search of a closed container that is not incident to an arrest, there must be not only probable cause but exigent circumstances. See United States v. Johnston, 497 F.2d 397, 398-99 (9th Cir.1974). Here, the district court summarily asserted that "the agents were excused from the ordinary requisite of a warrant by virtue of the exigent circumstances." 3 The court did not specify what those circumstances were, but rather simply cited to three cases where the court had found exigency due to the imminent departure of a train. However, none of these cases adequately supports the district court's ruling in the instant case.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.