The following excerpt is from United States v. Veon, 474 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1973):
The alleged restriction on cross-examination occurred when defense counsel attempted to re-examine a prosecution witness for the fifth time. The curtailment of repetitious examination on a marginally relevant point was a legitimate exercise of the court's discretion. United States v. Haili, 443 F.2d 1295, 1299 (9th Cir. 1971).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.