Does a public entity have a duty to take reasonable steps to protect the public from the danger?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Constantinescu v. Conejo Valley Unified School Dist., 16 Cal.App.4th 1466, 20 Cal.Rptr.2d 734 (Cal. App. 1993):

Where a public entity has actual or constructive notice of a dangerous condition, it has a duty to take reasonable steps to protect the public from the danger even if such dangers are not necessarily created by the entity. (Swaner v. City of Santa Monica, supra, 150 Cal.App.3d at p. 807, 198 Cal.Rptr. 208.) "[P]laintiffs must allege foreseeability before they can successfully recover from a public entity for injuries caused by the lack of a barrier." (Id., at p. 810, 198 Cal.Rptr. 208.) When facts disclose such foreseeable circumstances, "the question of the reasonableness of a public entity's action in any [such] particular situation is one of fact for a jury." (Id., at pp. 810, 813, 198 Cal.Rptr. 208.)

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a public entity is liable for a dangerous condition of public property? (California, United States of America)
Is a public entity or public employee liable for failure to establish a police department or otherwise to provide police protection services? (California, United States of America)
Is a public entity or a public employee liable under government code section 830.30.6 for injuries sustained by a person who was injured in a motor vehicle accident as a result of injuries sustained while driving under a traffic light? (California, United States of America)
Is a public entity liable for failure to provide adequate police protection? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reasonableness in a public entity's claim that it would have been too costly and impractical to do anything else? (California, United States of America)
Is it a crime for anyone to engage in a lewd act in any public place open to the public or exposed to public view? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
Can a public entity or public employee be held liable for failing to post a warning sign? (California, United States of America)
What is a lawyer's obligation to take reasonable steps to avoid reasonably foreseeable prejudice upon withdrawing from representation of a client? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.