Does a public body have a duty to compensate for the loss of a private property when it regulates land use?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from HFH, Ltd. v. Superior Court for Los Angeles County, 116 Cal.Rptr. 436, 41 Cal.App.3d 908 (Cal. App. 1974):
The fact that a public entity has the right or power to regulate land use does not ipso facto foreclose the duty to compensate for taking private property. (Turner v. County of Del Norte, 24 Cal.App.3d 311, 315, 101 Cal.Rptr. 93.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a peer review proceeding conducted by a private, not a public, private, institution need to be reviewed by a public body? (California, United States of America)
What are a number of federal and state constitutional provisions that prohibit the taking of private property for public use without just compensation? (California, United States of America)
What is the standing of a plaintiff to bring a claim against a private property owner to challenge picketing activities on its private property? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for taking private property for public use without just compensation? (California, United States of America)
What is the standing of a plaintiff to bring a claim against a private property owner to challenge picketing activities on its private property? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a public entity is liable for a dangerous condition of public property? (California, United States of America)
Is it a crime for anyone to engage in a lewd act in any public place open to the public or exposed to public view? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for the right of a public official to enter private property? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes a "taking" of private property for public use? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff recover both the property itself and the amount of compensation awarded by the Court of Appeal for wrongfully refusing to convey the property? (California, United States of America)
