Does a prosecutor's exercise of a racially motivated peremptory strike in an individual case violate the state constitutional right to a fair and impartial jury?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Buza, 230 Cal.Rptr.3d 681, 4 Cal.5th 658, 413 P.3d 1132 (Cal. 2018):

People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258, 148 Cal.Rptr. 890, 583 P.2d 748, we held that a prosecutor's exercise of a racially motivated peremptory strike in an individual case violates the state constitutional right to be tried by a fair and impartial jury, declining to follow the contrary federal constitutional rule set forth in Swain v. Alabama (1965) 380 U.S. 202, 85 S.Ct. 824, 13 L.Ed.2d 759. And in In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757, 76 Cal.Rptr.3d 683, 183 P.3d 384, we held that laws denying same-sex couples the right to marry violate equal protection under the state constitution, even though the only high court authority on point at the time, Baker v. Nelson (1972) 409 U.S. 810, 93 S.Ct. 37, 34 L.Ed.2d 65, had dismissed a similar appeal for want of a substantial federal question.

[4 Cal.5th 704]

Other Questions


What is the standard for determining whether a defendant's state constitutional right to an impartial jury was violated by an excusal for cause? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's comments about sexual assault violate a defendant's federal and state constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Under what circumstances will a federal criminal defendant be denied his right to exercise his constitutional right to a jury trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the admission of evidence in a civil case of criminal proceedings against Fuentes violate his federal constitutional right to exercise his right to privacy? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have the authority to interfere with the exercise or enjoyment of constitutional or statutory rights of 'any individual or individuals'? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a claim that allowing a juror to take home the jury instructions violated her constitutional right to a jury trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure of instruction to require a jury to produce written findings by the jury regarding the aggravating factors found and considered in returning a death sentence violate a defendant's constitutional right to meaningful appellate review? (California, United States of America)
Can a probationer be denied a right to exercise his constitutional right if he violates a probation condition? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.