Does a prosecutor's argument to the jury to view the crime through the eyes of the victim constitute misconduct at the guilt phase of trial?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hamilton, F075220 (Cal. App. 2019):
It is true "'that an appeal to the jury to view the crime through the eyes of the victim is misconduct at the guilt phase of trial.'" (People v. Jackson (2009) 45 Cal.4th 662, 691.) But, here, the prosecutor did not ask the jury to step into the complainants' shoes or imagine their suffering, and we cannot conclude the challenged statements exceeded the bounds of proper argument.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a prosecutor criticizes a defense attorney's conduct at trial, can the prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct if the prosecutor's arguments are not in the context of the defense counsel's conduct? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's argument that the absence of specific mitigating factors constitute aggravation constitute prosecutorial misconduct? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a claim that a prosecutor made improper racial references in the prosecutor's guilt phase argument to the jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have a valid argument that a prosecutor's argument in a sexual assault case was misconduct because it was inflammatory and sought to engender sympathy for the victim's son? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's failure to object to statements made by the prosecutor during his penalty phase argument constitute misconduct? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor wrongfully accused of prejudicial misconduct in her closing argument in a murder trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor make an argument that imploring the jury to consider the impact of the crime's impact on the victim's family? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a constitutional right to view the scene of the crime scene during the penalty phase of his murder trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to a fair trial if he is found guilty in the guilt phase of his trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment in response to a defense counsel's argument that the phone records for the apartment where the shootings occurred after the shooting occurred constitute misconduct? (California, United States of America)
