California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Shawn D., In re, 20 Cal.App.4th 200, 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 395 (Cal. App. 1993):
Although the People do not argue it, any suggestion that only express promises of a benefit render a confession involuntary must be rejected. Both the case law and common sense are to the contrary. Implied promises of leniency render a confession inadmissible. (People v. Jimenez supra, 21 Cal.3d 595, 611-612, 147 Cal.Rptr. 172, 580 P.2d 672; People v. Sultana, supra, 204 Cal.App.3d 511, 522, 251 Cal.Rptr. 115.) And for good reason. To hold otherwise would simply permit police to do indirectly what they could not do directly.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.