Does a plea agreement requiring the parties to comply with changes in the law made retroactive to them violate the terms of their plea agreement?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Carrillo, E063301 (Cal. App. 2016):
changes in the law." (Doe, supra, at pp. 73-74; Johnson v. Department of Justice (2015) 60 Cal.4th 871, 888-889, fn. 10 [requiring the parties' compliance with changes in the law made retroactive to them does not violate the terms of their plea agreement].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When an arbitration agreement requires the parties to share the costs of arbitration, does the court have jurisdiction to order that party to waive its right to arbitrate the other party's claim? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who has failed to comply with an order requiring him to produce his financial records comply with the terms of an order? (California, United States of America)
Does the Invention Agreement give a company a unilateral right to terminate or modify the terms of the agreement? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code apply to a defendant who has pleaded guilty to a charge of failing to comply with the terms of a conditional discharge from a plea agreement? (California, United States of America)
Can a judge retroactively retroactively make a defendant criminally liable for a violation of his right to privacy? (California, United States of America)
Does a state statute requiring an attorney to disclose certain terms under which his services can be advertised require that the attorney's advertising must contain a disclaimer? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for imposing a sanction including an order requiring an attorney for one party to pay attorney fees for an opposing party? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's instruction in a death penalty case inadequate when it refers to the use of the term "warrants", or does the term need to be changed? (California, United States of America)
Is a judicial decision retroactively retroactive when a settled rule is changed? (California, United States of America)
Is a party required to request that the court enter judgment on a valid jury verdict in order for that party to have the benefit of the verdict? (California, United States of America)
