California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Lugris v. Full-Swing Golf, Inc., D065651 (Cal. App. 2015):
Plaintiffs assert the trial court's ruling undermines public policy in favor of settlement agreements. They claim "[t]he trial court's position would force a party to make a choice between pursuing relief under section 664.6 or filing a costly and time-consuming lawsuit to enforce a settlement contract and recover attorneys' fees." But no such election is required either by law or by the trial court's ruling. (Nicholson v. Barab, supra, 233 Cal.App.3d at p. 1681.) Consistent with public policy, the ruling encourages parties to carefully consider the provisions to which they agree, especially knowing their
Page 9
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.