The following excerpt is from Weiler v. Chatham Forest Products, Inc., 370 F.3d 339 (2nd Cir. 2004):
8 We note that we have ruled in the section 304(a)(1) context that plaintiffs must exhaust administrative and state judicial remedies before proceeding in federal court. Action for Rational Transit v. West Side Highway Project, 699 F.2d 614, 616-17 (2d Cir.1983) (per curiam). A similar requirement may apply in the section 304(a)(3) context. But because the exhaustion issue is not before us, we do not here rule whether plaintiffs are required to exhaust their permit challenge in the state courts.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.