Does a plaintiff have any grounds to seek a jury trial on some aspects of their Fifth Cause of Action to set aside the foreclosure?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Rincon Ev Realty LLC v. CP III Rincon Towers, Inc., A138463 (Cal. App. 2017):

13. In their reply brief, plaintiffs (citing Selby Constructors v. McCarthy, supra, 91 Cal.App.3d 517) suggest they may be entitled to a jury trial on some aspects of their Fifth Cause of Action to set aside the foreclosure. Plaintiffs have waived or forfeited any such argument. As noted, plaintiffs expressly stated in the trial court that they did not seek a jury trial on this cause of action, and that it was an equitable claim.

14. In the trial court, it appears plaintiffs elected to pursue damages, rather than equitable relief, as to these causes of action. (See Walton v. Walton (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 277, 292-293.) The portions of plaintiffs' post-trial briefs and the trial court's statement of decision addressing these claims focused on whether plaintiffs had established the elements of the causes of action and whether they had proven damages, rather than on whether they were entitled to the equitable remedies mentioned in the Fifth Amended Complaint.

Other Questions


In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an inverse condemnation action against a governmental entity for damage caused to private property caused by a governmental action? (California, United States of America)
What causes of action can a plaintiff bring in a common law cause of action for emotional distress and wrongful discharge? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
On remand, in what circumstances will the trial court order that a plaintiff be entitled to the same amount of compensation as a plaintiff in a class action? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court abuse its discretion in concluding that a plaintiff can no longer plead a valid cause of action against Respondent? (California, United States of America)
Can a mere communication between a witness and a juror in a civil action be a ground for setting aside or granting a new trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for denying a motion for a new trial on the grounds that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion under the first two grounds? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff amend his fifth amended complaint to state a cause of action? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.