The following excerpt is from People v. Matthew P., 23 N.Y.S.3d 74, 26 N.Y.3d 332, 44 N.E.3d 149 (N.Y. 2015):
[citations omitted] ). Thus, as we have repeatedly explained, "the definition of ownership does not require that the owner have an independent right of possession but only that he [or she has] a possessory right which, however limited or contingent, [is] superior to that of defendant " (id. at 225226, 689 N.Y.S.2d 419, 711 N.E.2d 633, quoting People v. Hutchinson, 56 N.Y.2d 868, 869, 453 N.Y.S.2d 394, 438 N.E.2d 1109 [1982] ).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.