The following excerpt is from Lopez v. Barr, 925 F.3d 396 (9th Cir. 2019):
8 C.F.R. 1003.18(b) (emphasis added). We reasoned that such a regulation is necessary "[b]ecause circumstances may arise in which it is not feasible ... to state the date, time, and place of a removal hearing at the time the [Notice to Appear] is sent." Popa , 571 F.3d at 896. Pereira rejected this rationale, see 138 S. Ct. at 211819, and we have acknowledged that " Pereira appears to discount the relevance of 8 C.F.R. 1003.18 in the ... context of eligibility for cancellation of removal." Karingithi v. Whitaker , 913 F.3d 1158, 1160 n.1 (9th Cir. 2019).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.