California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. White, B262373 (Cal. App. 2016):
accusatory pleading fails separately to charge lesser included offenses, and the court grants a motion for acquittal under section 1118.1 without any prior indication that the ruling is intended to be limited to acquittal only on the greater, charged offense[], the judgment of acquittal on the charged offense includes acquittal on all uncharged lesser included offenses"]; accord, People v. Powell (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 304, 312-313 ["McElroy stands for the unproblematic proposition that a defendant may not be threatened anew by a lesser included offense after the greater offense has been unequivocally dismissed"].) White contends his counsel's failure to move for acquittal at the close of the People's case-in-chief violated his Sixth Amendment right to competent counsel.15
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.