Does a jury have to follow the court's instructions if the attorneys' comments on the law are in conflict?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Mondine, F069986 (Cal. App. 2016):
deliberation. The jury was told to follow the court's instructions if the attorneys' comments on the law were in conflict. It is presumed that the jurors followed the court's instructions. (People v. Letner and Tobin (2010) 50 Cal.4th 99, 152.) Given the state of this record, it is not reasonably probable appellant would have obtained a result more favorable in the absence of these comments. Accordingly, this claim fails.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the instruction that the jury was to follow the instructions if an attorney's comments appeared to be in conflict with the instructions apply? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury be instructed to follow the law as explained by the court, even if the attorney's comments are in conflict with the instructions given to the jury? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury be instructed to follow the law as explained by the court, even if the attorney's comments are in conflict with the instructions given to the jury? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the jury be instructed to follow the law as instructed, rather than consider any comments by the prosecutor that conflicted with the trial court's instructions? (California, United States of America)
Is a client's attorney required to repay all moneys laid out by the attorney to the attorney before the client can make a claim against the attorney? (California, United States of America)
Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellant seek review of an instruction in the Superior Court of Appeal where the original instruction was found to have made errors that could have been cured in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to instruct a jury to disregard an instruction in an assault case where the instruction had no antecedent in the facts? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
