California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Bishay, G053337 (Cal. App. 2018):
In this context, it is important to remember the recording of a fraudulent deed does not convey title to real property. (People v. Sanders (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1413.) As a result, no theft was accomplished by the recording of the forged deed. Similarly, forgery of a victim's signature on a document with the intent to defraud, i.e., count 2, is also not a theft. "'The essential act in all types of theft is taking. If a certain amount of money or property has been taken pursuant to one plan, it is most reasonable to consider the whole plan rather than to differentiate each component part. [Citation.] The real essence of the crime of forgery, however, is not concerned with the end, i.e.,
Page 24
what is obtained or taken by the forgery; it has to do with the means, i.e., the act of signing the name of another with intent to defraud and without authority, or of falsely making a document, or of uttering the document with intent to defraud.'" (People v. Drake (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 592, 596-597.) Although in many cases the goal of a forgery is a theft, forgery occurs regardless of whether a theft is ever actually attempted or accomplished.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.