Does a finding that a police officer's omissions were not knowing, intentional, or reckless disregard of the truth apply to the findings of a federal court?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Arlt, 42 F.3d 1402 (9th Cir. 1994):
Moreover, the district court did not err in subsequently finding that the officer's omissions were not knowing, intentional, or in reckless disregard of the truth. The district court's factual findings are reviewed for clear error. United States v. Bertrand, 926 F.2d 838, 842 (9th Cir.1991). In this case, there was adequate evidence on the record to support the court's determination and we find no reason to disturb its factual finding.
VII. Severance
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does Section 5G1.3 of the Federal Guidelines for Federal Sentences apply to a defendant who is convicted of a federal charge of possession of a firearm by a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the difference between a federal district court and a federal magistrate judge's recommendation that a police air filter box contains firearms that pose a threat to the officer? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas proceeding concerning a state prisoner, is a federal court required to presume that a state court's factual findings are correct? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal court overturn a federal district court's finding that appellant waived his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the basis for a federal district court's finding that a state court transcript is sufficient basis for the district court to grant a motion requiring an evidentiary hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal habeas corpus judge finds that a state criminal court violated the Fourth Amendment, what are the implications for the federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
