The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Holz, 26 F.3d 134 (9th Cir. 1994):
We review for clear error the district court's factual finding that a defendant did not possess a firearm solely for sporting or collection purposes. United States v. Gavilan, 966 F.2d 530, 531 (9th Cir.1992); United States v. Uzelac, 921 F.2d 204, 205 (9th Cir.1990).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.