Does a finder of fact determined that one of the essential elements has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt?
"New York", United States of America
The following excerpt is from State v. Shabazz, 2016 NY Slip Op 33067 (U) (N.Y. Cty. Ct. 2016):
defendant of the second crime, the finder of fact determined that one of the essential elements has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. People v. Booker, 141 AD3d 834 (3d Dept., 2016); People v. Kramer, 118 AD3d 1040 (3d Dept., 2014).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If there is an error in the finding that a defendant is not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of reasonable doubt, is that error harmless beyond reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether the jury has found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime beyond reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a rational jury find that the essential elements of the crime were not proven beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a jury reasonably have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining that a rational trier of fact could not have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is sufficient to support a conviction if any rational juror could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for proving the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
