Does a failure to object in the trial court on the grounds that a probation condition is facially vague or overbroad?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Johnson, F065152 (Cal. App. 2014):
2. Failure to object in the trial court on the ground that a probation condition is facially vague or overbroad does not forfeit appellate review of the issue provided the question can be resolved as a matter of law without reference to the sentencing record. (People v. Moore (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1179, 1183-1184.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a criminal defendant's failure to object in the trial court to an unreasonable probation condition forfeits the claim? (California, United States of America)
Is Lord's failure to object to the probation search condition in the trial court invalid on appeal? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated a defense counsel's claim that the trial court would not have entertained an objection to a probation condition? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the doctrine of waiver in the context of a defendant's failure to object to conditions of probation? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure to object to a probation condition at trial constitute a forfeiture of the claim on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does a defense counsel's failure to make an offer of proof in response to a sustaining objection to the trial court's sustaining a relevance objection waiver? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion that appellate courts review probation conditions for abuse of abuse of power, if the issue was raised in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
