California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Newsome, F067578 (Cal. App. 2016):
6. Because no ex post facto violation occurred, we will not address appellant's argument that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance in failing to raise an ex post facto objection in the trial court. (People v. Torrez (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 1084, 1091 [defense counsel is not required to make futile motions or meritless objections to appear competent].)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.