California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Myers, 200 Cal.Rptr.3d 19, 245 Cal.App.4th 794 (Cal. App. 2016):
3 Had defendant been armed with a firearm, whether or not an arming enhancement had been pleaded, he would not have been eligible for resentencing. (See People v. Quinones(2014) 228 Cal.App.4th 1040, 10441045, 175 Cal.Rptr.3d 906.) However, the jury acquitted defendant of possession of a firearm by a felon (former 12021, subd. (a)(1)) (Myers I,supra,at p. 1) and the People conceded he was eligible for resentencing.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.