The following excerpt is from United States v. Cannon, No. 14-2618-cr (2nd Cir. 2016):
1. Cannon does not contest the sufficiency of the evidence as to the second and third elements of a 922(g)(1) crime, i.e., that the charged possession was "in or affecting commerce," and that he had "a previous felony conviction." United States v. Amante, 418 F.3d at 221 n.1.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.