California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Sully, 283 Cal.Rptr. 144, 53 Cal.3d 1195, 812 P.2d 163 (Cal. 1991):
A defendant cannot consent to be interrogated and then select the portions of the interrogation that will be used at his trial. The record does not reveal that any admission made by defendant after he had invoked Miranda rights was admitted at his trial. Defendant does not demonstrate that his constitutional or other legal rights were in any way violated in this case. (People v. Silva, supra, 45 Cal.3d at pp. 629-630, 247 Cal.Rptr. 573, 754 P.2d 1070.) Whether or not expressly discussed, we have considered and rejected as without merit all of the assignments of error presented in all of defendant's briefs.
[53 Cal.3d 1253]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.