The following excerpt is from Wiig v. Ives, No. CIV S-10-1966 EFB P (E.D. Cal. 2011):
Moreover, as petitioner has raised the prior conviction issue already in a 2255 motion, and could have raised the issue of the trial court's use of the prior conviction in that motion, these claims are "second or successive, " and petitioner must obtain authorization from the court of appeals to present these claims. United States v. Lopez, 577 F.3d 1053, 1056-57 (9th Cir. 2009). As petitioner has not obtained such authorization, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the claims. Id. Accordingly, petitioner's claims relating to his federal conviction must be dismissed. As it is apparent that petitioner cannot bring these claims within this court's jurisdiction, dismissal of these claims is without leave to amend. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1128 (9th Cir. 2000) (indigent prisoner proceeding without counsel must be given leave to file amended complaint unless the court can rule out any possibility that the plaintiff could state a claim).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.