The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Meraz-Solomon, 3 F.3d 298 (9th Cir. 1993):
Whether a defendant has the burden of proving his duress defense by a preponderance of the evidence is a question of law which we review de novo. United States v. Dominguez-Mestas, 929 F.2d 1379, 1381 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 419, 116 L.Ed.2d 440 (1991).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.