Does a Defendant have a right to refuse a blood test on the grounds it would violate his privacy or his right against self-incrimination?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from County of El Dorado v. Schneider, 191 Cal.App.3d 1263, 237 Cal.Rptr. 51 (Cal. App. 1987):
8 Defendant had no right to refuse the court ordered blood test on the ground it would violate his right against self-incrimination (Schmerber v. California (1966) 384 U.S. 757, 760-765, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 1830-1833, 16 L.Ed.2d 908, 914-916) or his right to privacy. (Shults v. Superior Court (1980) 113 Cal.App.3d 696, 699-700, 170 Cal.Rptr. 297; see also People v. Bynon (1956) 146 Cal.App.2d 7, 303 P.2d 75.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a Defendant have a right to refuse a blood test on the grounds it would violate his right against self-incrimination? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court's recent rulings in a civil case against the Defendant violated the Defendant's civil rights? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's failure to disclose unredacted videotape violate a defendant's right to privacy? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's right to due process violated when evidence of a witness's identification of that defendant is admitted? (California, United States of America)
Can a judge retroactively retroactively make a defendant criminally liable for a violation of his right to privacy? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant waives his right to be present at trial by refusing to leave the courtroom, does he have a right to remain in the courtroom? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have grounds to argue that a conviction or acquittal in a murder case against Defendant violated the prohibition against double jeopardy? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that admitting the evidence in a civil case would have violated his federal confrontation rights? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances would a defendant have been denied a continuance of his trial on the grounds that the trial would have been more favorable to him? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion that a denial of a motion on appeal by defendants on appeal violate their right to appeal against the denial of their motion violate their due process? (California, United States of America)
