The following excerpt is from Daws v. United States, No. 18-203 (2nd Cir. 2019):
427; Dirks v. SEC, 463 U.S. 646, 662 (1983), provided a sufficient factual predicate to support his guilty plea to conspiracy to commit insider trading, he did not show a compelling basis to invalidate that plea. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts and the record of prior proceedings, to which we refer only as necessary to explain our decision to affirm.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.