Does a court have the authority to vacate an award when the award is invalid because it contains a legal or factual error?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Quiambao v. San Francisco Mun. Transp. Agency, A148511 (Cal. App. 2017):
Marsch v. Williams (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 238, 243-244 ["a court may not vacate an award even if it contains a legal or factual error on its face which results in substantial injustice"].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
Is a claim that a court abused its discretion in awarding restitution because the lower court applied an incorrect legal standard tantamount to a de novo review? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for appealing against a decision by the California Superior Court that vacates an arbitration award and does not order a rehearing? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have any authority or authority to review the judgment of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have any authority or authority to second-guess the factual determination of an attorney? (California, United States of America)
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
