California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Lasky, Haas, Cohler & Munter v. Superior Court, 172 Cal.App.3d 264, 218 Cal.Rptr. 205 (Cal. App. 1985):
Weiss v. Marcus, supra, 51 Cal.App.3d at page 599, 124 Cal.Rptr. 297, held that a client who discharges his litigation counsel and retains new counsel to consummate the pending litigation "remains the owner" of the attorney's "work product" irrespective of whether the attorney has been paid for his services.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.