California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Lemer v. Boise Cascade, Inc., 107 Cal.App.3d 1, 165 Cal.Rptr. 555 (Cal. App. 1980):
Boise argues generally that the class action settlement should bar subsequent recovery of punitive damages by a member of the class, because the punitive and deterrent functions of such damages have already been served, and a subsequent recovery of punitive damages amounts to a form of "civil double jeopardy." The problems posed by multiple punitive damage suits have troubled both courts (e.g., Roginsky v.
Page 559
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.