What is the test for notice, delay and misconduct in spousal support cases?
New Brunswick, Canada
The following excerpt is from Campbell v Vaughan, 2015 NBQB 110 (CanLII):
The Kerr v. Baranow decision stresses that notice, delay and misconduct generally carry more weight in relation to claims for spousal support. Once the proceedings are commenced, there is clear notice to the payor that the recipient is dissatisfied with the order in place and is requesting a variation.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law supporting unequal division of property between spouses? (New Brunswick, Canada)
If you are in a long-term marriage, what is the impact of retirement on spousal support? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the case law on the basis of a mother’s argument that a child is entitled to a reduction in the amount of child support if she stops working? (New Brunswick, Canada)
In what circumstances will a spouse not receive spousal support from her husband's increased income? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a spouse is entitled to Prospective Spousal Support? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the evidence supporting the allegation that there was no safe avenue of escape for the accused in the assault case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
How has the court considered the tax implications of lump sum payments of spousal support compared to periodic payments of periodic payments? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Does spousal support continue to be relevant? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the legal framework to apply to post-retirement spousal support obligations? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on spousal support? (New Brunswick, Canada)
