Does the Limitations Act, 2002, change the common law with respect to demand promissory notes?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Bank of Nova Scotia v. Williamson, 2009 ONCA 754 (CanLII):

In Hare v. Hare, this court held that the Limitations Act, 2002 does not, nor was it intended to change the common law with respect to the operation of demand promissory notes. The same applies to the common law regarding demand guarantees. As discussed above, a demand is required before anything is owed by a guarantor under a third-party guarantee.

Other Questions


What is the limitation period for making a demand on a non-demand debt? (Ontario, Canada)
If a limitation period is extended after the expiry of the limitation period, is it appropriate to amend the statute of limitation period? (Ontario, Canada)
What is a material change in the definition of a change in terms of material change? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for respect and respect for the jury's verdict in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
When an employer unilaterally changes the essential terms of an employee’s contract of employment and the employee does not agree to the changes, is the employee constructively dismissed? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the delivery of a s. 112 assessment report constitute a material change in circumstances justifying a change in the existing arrangement? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a common law spouse have a duty to perform unpaid work for her common law partner? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for changing a temporary order without requiring a material change? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a material change in circumstances under what circumstances would have changed the terms of an order under which an order was made? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the common law common law authorizes a search incident to a lawful arrest? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.