Edwards J. referred to Borowski v. Attorney General of Canada (1989) 1989 CanLII 123 (SCC), 57 D.L.R. (4th) 231 (S.C.C.). In that case, Sopinka J., at 239, said that in order to determine an issue of mootness it is necessary first to consider whether the “tangible and concrete dispute has disappeared and the issues have become academic” and second, if the answer to that question is in the affirmative, to decide if the court should exercise its discretion to hear the case anyway.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.