The exercise of determining an appropriate costs award involves balancing the purposes of costs orders (partial indemnification of successful litigants, encouraging settlement, and discouraging inappropriate conduct) with the importance of not unfairly deterring people from pursuing legitimate claims for fear of disproportionate costs consequences. See Cassidy v. Cassidy, 2011 CarswellOnt 1541 (S.C.J.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.