Part of the discrimination analysis includes consideration of whether the plaintiff group suffers from a pre-existing disadvantage, stereotyping, prejudice or vulnerability. In this case, the plaintiffs argue that older surviving spouses are disadvantaged compared to younger spouses. The plaintiff relies on the judgment in Law v. Canada where Iacobucci J. said “…those who are younger when they lose a spouse are more able to replace the income lost from the death of a spouse.”(¶ 103,104)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.