Defendants found liable in negligence are responsible for putting the plaintiff in the position they would have been in but for their injuries. In applying this principle, courts are tasked with “gaz[ing] … into the crystal ball” (Andrews v. Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd., 1978 CanLII 1 (SCC), [1978] 2 S.C.R. 229 at 251) with respect to loss of future earning capacity. This may include extrapolating from general statistics that reflect societal inequalities. The question which arises is: to what extent should these statistics serve as a measure of a disadvantaged group member’s damages?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.