British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Harrison v. Scheelar, 2019 BCCRT 97 (CanLII):
23. A seller has no duty to disclose patent defects to purchasers, although they must not actively conceal them: Cardwell; Rogalinski v. Scorey, 2011 BCSC 1050.
24. In general, there is a significant onus on the purchaser to inspect and discover patent defects. This means that a defect which might not be readily apparent on a casual inspection can nevertheless be “patent” if it would have been discovered on a reasonable inspection by a qualified person. In some cases, a purchaser is expected to retain the appropriate expert to inspect the property (such as an electrician or a carpenter). See for example Eberts v. Aitchison, 2000 BCSC 1103.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.