What is the current state of the law on physician misconduct?

Many of the central principles to judge alleged physician misconduct were established by Justice Sopinka in ter Neuzen v. Korn, 1995 CanLII 72 (SCC), [1995] 3 S.C.R. 674 at 693, 127 D.L.R. (4th) 577: a physician to conduct his or her practice “... in accordance with the conduct of a prudent and diligent doctor in the same circumstances.”: at 693; “...when a doctor acts in accordance with a recognized and respectable practice of the profession, he or she will not be found to be negligent.”: at 695; “... the conduct of physicians must be judged in the light of the knowledge that ought to have been reasonably possessed at the time of the alleged act of negligence.”: at 693; and “... courts should be careful not to rely upon the perfect vision afforded by hindsight. In order to evaluate a particular exercise of judgment fairly, the doctor's limited ability to foresee future events when determining a course of conduct must be borne in mind. ...”: at 693, quoting Lapointe v. Hôpital Le Gardeur, 1992 CanLII 119 (SCC), [1992] 1 S.C.R. 351 at 362-63, 90 D.L.R. (4th) 7.