Further, an applicant may be unable to fund a lawsuit as his financial resources are tied up in the company that is subject of the litigation (as was the case in Wilson v. Conley, supra.) In those circumstances, a plaintiff may not qualify as truly impecunious but he is, in my view, able to advance a claim pursuant to s. 7(4) of the Third Schedule of the Companies Act. The issue is whether his financial circumstances will prevent him from advancing a meritorious claim if an interim order for costs is not granted.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.