What is the test for establishing that a plaintiff would not have had an operation?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Martin v. Capital Health Authority, 2007 ABQB 260 (CanLII):

I agree with the submission that it is not upon the Plaintiffs to prove anything more than that he would not have the operation at that particular time. To say that he must establish that he would never have the operation is in direct contradiction to Reibl v. Hughes.

Other Questions


What is the impact of a malfunctioning sewage operation on a plaintiff's property? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the burden of proof required to establish that a deceased would have earned income in the future? (Alberta, Canada)
If plaintiff had retained the home and at the trial date could she say she intended to occupy or retain the home, and if so, would the cost of the home be taken into consideration for damages? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has made all reasonable efforts to establish the identity of the driver? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that the named plaintiff had no interest in the action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for calculating the range of expenses that a plaintiff would have incurred in the course of earning a living? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to be put in a position he or she would have been in if the misrepresentation had not been made? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a plaintiff's estate entitled to receive payments from the operators of surface lease agreements? (Alberta, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident case, in what circumstances will a plaintiff not be liable for failing to warn the driver of the vehicle that there is no evidence that such warnings would have prevented the accident? (Alberta, Canada)
How much is a plaintiff’s claim for medical malpractice compensation? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.