How do you conduct an affidavit of documents?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Dorchak v. Krupka, 1997 ABCA 89 (CanLII):
I reiterate that such individual details are not necessary to prove whether the existence of a given privileged document is revealed by the affidavit of documents. A bundle of numbered papers suffices. Indeed, because consecutive document numbers are unambiguous, they are slightly better for that purpose than word descriptions of individual documents: see Solid Waste v. Philip, supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a transcript of an examination conducted on affidavit subject to the implied undertaking? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a municipal counsellor who is alleged to have executed documents after destroying the documents? (Alberta, Canada)
How much notice can an employer give to an employee when the employer has made a decision not to conduct an internal investigation into the employee’s conduct? (Alberta, Canada)
Is it sufficient to describe privileged documents as: Document mechanically numbered 1 to 5287? (Alberta, Canada)
What documents relating to the matters in question should be disclosed in an affidavit? (Alberta, Canada)
Would the admission of the balloons in evidence constitute judicial condonation of unacceptable conduct by the investigatory or prosecutorial agencies? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a settlement be reached before the parties complete the settlement documentation? (Alberta, Canada)
Is the filing of an affidavit of records a "necessarily required step" in an action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a trial can be conveniently conducted by a jury? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the impact of allegations of unethical conduct, misrepresentation before the court and sharp practice? (Alberta, Canada)
