Counsel relies in this connection on the case of Zahynacz v. Kozak, [1998] B.C.J. No. 1947, paras. 67-76, and what is said there about a “gatekeeper” role adopted by plaintiff’s counsel in that particular case and counsel’s failure to pass on information to the plaintiff’s attending physician. In that case the trial judge left it that whether one called “the failure to communicate and treat an intervening act, an unforeseeable circumstance or a failure to mitigate” he was left with an unsatisfactory evidential background and reduced the award of damages from what it otherwise would have been.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.