There remains a residual discretion on the part of the trial judge to nonetheless decline to award double costs: Deacon v. Barron, 2009 BCSC 637. However, in that case the unsuccessful defendant was of limited means and the imposition of double costs would have constituted a hardship. In this case, those roles are reversed in that the successful plaintiffs are a semi-retired couple of modest means while the defendant is a land developer.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.