From all the foregoing it is clear that in any case of contract where damages for distress flowing from that breach are sought, it must be shown that the contract expressly, or by necessary inference from the evidence, provided for that remedy in the event of breach. Further, it is clear that the usual contract of employment does not so provide. Here there is no evidence that the contract of employment was in any way unusual. Nor is there any evidence that the original contract was added to or changed in any way, as seems to be the case in Pilon v. Peugeot, supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.