Although a contempt application must be decided on the wording of the order, and the alleged contemnor must be given the benefit of any ambiguity, the surrounding circumstances known to the alleged contemnor−the “factual matrix” surrounding the making of the order−may be considered in determining the order’s meaning, as demonstrated in Agricultural Land Commission v. Munro, 2006 BCSC 1408:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.