Consent orders represent an agreement of the parties and will not generally be set aside or varied unless grounds can be shown that would justify setting aside the underlying contract: see Shackleton v. Shackleton, 1999 BCCA 704, 1 R.F.L. (5th) 459 ¶ 12. Grounds would include such things as duress, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, mistake, and unconscionability. Nothing of the sort has been suggested here and, in my view, the appellant remains bound by the agreement and by the order that incorporated it.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.