Furthermore, as the court noted in Miron v. Trudel, supra, “63 Ontario statutes currently make no distinction between married partners and unmarried partners who have cohabited in a conjugal relationship” (para. 155). To include common law partners in the evidentiary protection granted by s. 4 harmonizes the Canada Evidence Act with other legislation which, for most intents and purposes, has abolished the distinction between married and common law spouses. A further 21 Ontario statutes employed a modified definition of “spouse”, i.e. as requiring marriage or cohabitation for at least one year or having a child together, or entering into a cohabitation agreement (para. 170). To include common law spouses in the evidentiary protection of s. 4 of the Canada Evidence Act does no more than keep the law in step with changed and changing social and moral fabric of Canada.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.