The common issues question should be approached purposively. There is no formulaic approach that determines this requirement. The underlying question is whether, if the action continues as a class proceeding, will “duplication of fact-finding or legal analysis” be avoided? (Western Canadian Shopping Centres at para. 39). If necessary, the list of common issues can be further refined as the litigation moves forward (Robertson v. Thomson Corp., at p. 173).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.